Intro –
Even from a brief reading of the texts, it is clear that the
relationship between the writer and audience of Facebook statuses will
drastically affect the language chosen by the composer of the text.
Due to
the fact that texts 2 and 6 are written on personal Facebook pages, pragmatic
understanding between the writer and receiver plays a big part in the language
chosen. In Text 2,
the writer uses abbreviations such as ‘ikr’ (meaning ‘I know right’) and
clippings of verbs such as ‘hav’ and movin’ which reflect a degree of informality within the text.
This shows that the writer and receiver are comfortable with each other and do
not expect a high degree of formality within their communication. We also see the writer use abbreviations
such as the conjunction ‘cos’ instead of ‘because’ and a lack of punctuation in
the contraction ‘ill’. Arguably,
this is an indicator that the writer sees social media as a multimodal form of
communication and so is using features of spoken language in his writing. In text 6, we see slightly
different features as the writer uses exaggerated formality to create humour
through the formal salutation ‘dear’ and religious proper non ‘Lord’. The receivers of this status would
immediately realise, through shared understanding, that the writer was not
being serious. Additionally,
the writer attempts to replace the prosodic features lost through CMC by using
emojis ‘😊’ to show how happy she is, and non standard punctuation ‘!!!!’
after the adjective ‘brilliant’ to show that she is in a good mood. If it was not for this, her final
statement ‘please don’t let my husband be home…’ could sound quite sinister. The use of abbreviations in text 2 would be looked down
upon by prescriptivists such as broadcaster John Humphrys who says that CMC is ‘doing
to the English language what Genghis Kahn did to Asia.’ I would disagree with
this attitude, however, as the message is clearly understood between sender and
receiver due to shared understanding, and so is merely improving the efficiency
of their message rather than ruining it.
Bringing
text together through context (AO3)
Analyse
examples
Explain
why this is being done in context
No comments:
Post a Comment